Rotation Count (medium) #

Given an array of numbers which is sorted in ascending order and is rotated ā€˜k’ times around a pivot, find ā€˜k’.

You can assume that the array does not have any duplicates.

Example 1:

Input: [10, 15, 1, 3, 8]
Output: 2
Explanation: The array has been rotated 2 times.
Created with Fabric.js 1.6.0-rc.1 1 3 8 10 15 Original array: Array after 2 rotations: 10 15 1 3 8

Example 2:

Input: [4, 5, 7, 9, 10, -1, 2]
Output: 5
Explanation: The array has been rotated 5 times.
Created with Fabric.js 1.6.0-rc.1 Original array: -1 2 4 5 7 9 10 4 5 7 9 10 -1 2 Array after 5 rotations:

Example 3:

Input: [1, 3, 8, 10]
Output: 0
Explanation: The array has not been rotated.

Solution #

This problem follows the Binary Search pattern. We can use a similar strategy as discussed in Search in Rotated Array.

In this problem, actually, we are asked to find the index of the minimum element. The number of times the minimum element is moved to the right will be equal to the number of rotations. An interesting fact about the minimum element is that it is the only element in the given array which is smaller than its previous element. Since the array is sorted in ascending order, all other elements are bigger than their previous element.

After calculating the middle, we can compare the number at index middle with its previous and next number. This will give us two options:

  1. If arr[middle] > arr[middle + 1], then the element at middle + 1 is the smallest.
  2. If arr[middle - 1] > arr[middle], then the element at middle is the smallest.

To adjust the ranges we can follow the same approach as discussed in Search in Rotated Array. Comparing the numbers at indices start and middle will give us two options:

  1. If arr[start] < arr[middle], the numbers from start to middle are sorted.
  2. Else, the numbers from middle + 1 to end are sorted.

Code #

Here is what our algorithm will look like:

Output

0.474s

2 5 0

Time complexity #

Since we are reducing the search range by half at every step, this means that the time complexity of our algorithm will be O(logN)O(logN) where ā€˜N’ is the total elements in the given array.

Space complexity #

The algorithm runs in constant space O(1)O(1).

Similar Problems #

Problem 1 #

How do we find the rotation count of a sorted and rotated array that has duplicates too?

The above code will fail on the following example!

Example 1:

Input: [3, 3, 7, 3]
Output: 3
Explanation: The array has been rotated 3 times
Created with Fabric.js 1.6.0-rc.1 Original array: 3 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 Array after 3 rotations:

Solution
We can follow the same approach as discussed in Search in Rotated Array. The only difference is that before incrementing start or decrementing end, we will check if either of them is the smallest number.

Output

0.707s

3

Time complexity
This algorithm will run in O(logN)O(logN) most of the times, but since we only skip two numbers in case of duplicates instead of the half of the numbers, therefore the worst case time complexity will become O(N)O(N).

Space complexity #

The algorithm runs in constant space O(1)O(1).

Mark as Completed
←    Back
Problem Challenge 3
Next    →
Introduction